On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:36:25PM +0000, Salil Mehta wrote:
> From: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.hu...@huawei.com>
>
> This patch modified the logic of allocating memory using APIs in
> hns RoCE driver. We used kcalloc instead of kmalloc_array and
> bitmap_zero. And When kcalloc failed, call vzalloc to alloc
> memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Hu (Xavier) <xavier.hu...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ping Zhang <zhangpi...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.me...@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c
> index fb87883..d3dfb5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c
> @@ -137,11 +137,12 @@ static int hns_roce_buddy_init(struct hns_roce_buddy
> *buddy, int max_order)
>
> for (i = 0; i <= buddy->max_order; ++i) {
> s = BITS_TO_LONGS(1 << (buddy->max_order - i));
> - buddy->bits[i] = kmalloc_array(s, sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!buddy->bits[i])
> - goto err_out_free;
> -
> - bitmap_zero(buddy->bits[i], 1 << (buddy->max_order - i));
> + buddy->bits[i] = kcalloc(s, sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buddy->bits[i]) {
> + buddy->bits[i] = vzalloc(s * sizeof(long));I wonder, why don't you use directly vzalloc instead of kcalloc fallback? > + if (!buddy->bits[i]) > + goto err_out_free; > + } > }
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
