On Tuesday 08 November 2016 05:28 PM, Pavel Labath wrote:
+ if (min_dist > 0 && min_dist != -1) { >> + /* No exact match found. */ >> + wp = slots[closest_match]; >> + info = counter_arch_bp(wp); >> + info->trigger = addr; >> + perf_bp_event(wp, regs); >> + }> > Why don't we need to bother with the stepping in the case of a non-exact > match?Good catch. I think we do. I must have dropped that part somehow. Pratyush, could you include the attached fixup in the next batch?
Ok, will do. ~Pratyush
