On 11/09/2016 06:06 PM, Brenden Blanco wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:57:32AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 11/09/2016 10:45 AM, Zhiyi Sun wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:05:31AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 11/09/2016 08:35 AM, Zhiyi Sun wrote:
There are rx_ring_num queues. Each queue will load xdp prog. So
bpf_prog_add() should add rx_ring_num to ref_cnt.
Signed-off-by: Zhiyi Sun <zhiyi...@gmail.com>
Your analysis looks incorrect to me. Please elaborate in more detail why
you think current code is buggy ...
Yes, you are correct. My patch is incorrect. It is not a bug.
Call path is dev_change_xdp_fd(), which does bpf_prog_get_type() on the
fd. This already takes a ref and only drops it in case of error. Thus
in mlx4_xdp_set(), you only need priv->rx_ring_num - 1 refs for the rest
of the rings, so that dropping refs from old_prog makes sure we release
it again. Looks correct to me (maybe a comment would have helped there).
I thought mlx4's code is incorrect because in mlx5's driver, function
mlx5e_xdp_set() calls a pair of bpf_prog_add/put, the number of add and
put to the refs are same. I didn't notice that one "add" has been called in its
calller. So, it seems that mlx5's code is incorrect, right?
Yep, I think the two attached patches are needed.
The other thing I noticed in mlx5e_create_rq() is that it calls
bpf_prog_add(rq->xdp_prog, 1) without actually checking for errors.
From d2bd6b3cd8636716a06b0ea3b1e041e16f87cce0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
<d2bd6b3cd8636716a06b0ea3b1e041e16f87cce0.1478685278.git.dan...@iogearbox.net>
From: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:31:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf, mlx4: fix prog refcount in
mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources error path
Commit 67f8b1dcb9ee ("net/mlx4_en: Refactor the XDP forwarding rings
scheme") added a bug in that the prog's reference count is not dropped
in the error path when mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources() is failing.
We previously took bpf_prog_add(prog, priv->rx_ring_num - 1), that we
need to release again. Earlier in the call-path, dev_change_xdp_fd()
itself holds a ref to the prog as well, which is then released though
bpf_prog_put() due to the propagated error.
Fixes: 67f8b1dcb9ee ("net/mlx4_en: Refactor the XDP forwarding rings scheme")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c | 5 ++++-
include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
index 0f6225c..4104aec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
@@ -2747,8 +2747,11 @@ static int mlx4_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct
bpf_prog *prog)
}
err = mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources(priv, tmp, &new_prof);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
+ if (prog)
+ bpf_prog_add_undo(prog, priv->rx_ring_num - 1);
Why not just move the above bpf_prog_add to be below the try_alloc?
Nobody needs those references until all of the resources have been
allocated, and then we can remove the need for bpf_prog_add_undo.
Right, looked into this and the convention is to call
mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources()
plus mlx4_en_safe_replace_resources(), which must always succeed (currently).
Seems rather complex to go this route instead; bpf_prog_add_undo() or *_sub()
[however we name it] is safe and straight forward, since we're guaranteed to
have one reference already.
goto unlock_out;
+ }
if (priv->port_up) {
port_up = 1;
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index edcd96d..4f6a4f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ u64 bpf_event_output(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, void
*meta, u64 meta_size,
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get(u32 ufd);
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_get_type(u32 ufd, enum bpf_prog_type type);
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_add(struct bpf_prog *prog, int i);
+void bpf_prog_add_undo(struct bpf_prog *prog, int i);
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_inc(struct bpf_prog *prog);
void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 228f962..a6e4dd8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -680,6 +680,17 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_add(struct bpf_prog *prog, int i)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_add);
+void bpf_prog_add_undo(struct bpf_prog *prog, int i)
+{
+ /* Only to be used for undoing previous bpf_prog_add() in some
+ * error path. We still know that another entity in our call
+ * path holds a reference to the program, thus atomic_sub() can
+ * be safely used here!
+ */
+ atomic_sub(i, &prog->aux->refcnt);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_add_undo);
+
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_inc(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
return bpf_prog_add(prog, 1);
--
1.9.3
From f0789544432bbb89c53c3b8ac6575d48fed97786 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
<f0789544432bbb89c53c3b8ac6575d48fed97786.1478685278.git.dan...@iogearbox.net>
In-Reply-To:
<d2bd6b3cd8636716a06b0ea3b1e041e16f87cce0.1478685278.git.dan...@iogearbox.net>
References:
<d2bd6b3cd8636716a06b0ea3b1e041e16f87cce0.1478685278.git.dan...@iogearbox.net>
From: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:51:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] bpf, mlx5: fix prog refcount in mlx5e_xdp_set
dev_change_xdp_fd() already holds a reference, so bpf_prog_add(prog, 1)
is not correct as it takes one reference too much and will thus leak
the prog eventually. Also, bpf_prog_add() can fail and is not checked
for errors here.
Fixes: 86994156c736 ("net/mlx5e: XDP fast RX drop bpf programs support")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
index ba0c774..63309dd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -3121,8 +3121,6 @@ static int mlx5e_xdp_set(struct net_device *netdev,
struct bpf_prog *prog)
/* exchange programs */
old_prog = xchg(&priv->xdp_prog, prog);
- if (prog)
- bpf_prog_add(prog, 1);
There is also another use of bpf_prog_add down below, which does not
check the error return. Same in mlx5e_create_rq.
Yeah, saw that, too. These two unchecked bpf_prog_add() would be another
issue to fix on top of this, ohh well.
For net-next, I'll just add a __must_check to these functions, so we can
avoid such issues in future and let the compiler complain early enough
instead.
Thanks,
Daniel
