On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 02:33:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:55:31 +0100 Vitaly Wool <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCH v3] z3fold: use per-page read/write lock > > I've rewritten the title to "mm/z3fold.c: use per-page spinlock" > > (I prefer to have "mm" in the title to easily identify it as an MM > patch, and using "mm: z3fold: ..." seems odd when the actual pathname > conveys the same info.)
Still think it needs to be raw_spinlock_t, otherwise the build bug on on the header size will break again. Better would be to fix that build bug though -Andi
