> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Rosin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:02 PM > To: Vadim Pasternak <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > Michael Shych <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [patch v5] i2c: mux: mellanox: add driver > > On 2016-11-10 13:56, Vadim Pasternak wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Peter Rosin [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:13 PM > >> To: Vadim Pasternak <[email protected]>; [email protected] > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected]; Michael Shych <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [patch v5] i2c: mux: mellanox: add driver > >> > >> [resend to all, got the wrong button, sorry] > >> > >> On 2016-11-10 11:42, Peter Rosin wrote: > >>> On 2016-11-03 06:20, Vadim Pasternak wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I see that this patch has not been picked-up yet for i2c-next. > >>>> Is it possible it was missed from some reason? > >>> > >>> Yes, apparently, really sorry about that! > >>> > >>> I'll put it in a branch and make a pull request for Wolfram (but > >>> that is a bit new for me, we'll see how it goes). > >> > >> But now that I looked again, I noticed that the source is dual > >> licensed and yet your MODULE_LICENSE tag says only "GPL v2". I.e. the > >> same issue your i2c master driver had that Vladimir Zapolskiy noticed. > >> > >> Please fix this, and it might be a good idea to take a look in your > >> other drivers as well in case you have further problems in this > >> department... > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > Thank you for reply. > > I'll re-submit it from the current i2c next branch. > > Since I'll fix the license, I guess I should issue it as "patch v6". Right? > > Sounds right, yes.
OK, will do it. And I'll fix the comment according to your last recommendation. Cheers, Vadim. > > Cheers, > Peter
