On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:15:43AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:58:30 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:34:25AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > > > index 0888a879120f..d6c6aa80675f 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > > > @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void amd_e400_idle(void)
> > > > if (!amd_e400_c1e_detected) {
> > > > u32 lo, hi;
> > > >
> > > > - rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi);
> > > > + RCU_NONIDLE(rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi));
> > > >
> > > > if (lo & K8_INTP_C1E_ACTIVE_MASK) {
> > > > amd_e400_c1e_detected = true;
> >
> > OK, so while looking at this again, I don't like this ether :/
> >
> > Problem with this one is that it always adds the RCU fiddling overhead,
> > even when we're not tracing.
> >
> > I could do an rdmsr_notrace() for this one, dunno if its important.
>
> But that would neglect the point of tracing rdmsr. What about:
>
> /* tracepoints require RCU enabled */
> if (trace_read_msr_enabled())
> RCU_NONIDLE(rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi));
> else
> rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi);
Yeah, but this one does a printk() when it hits the contidion it checks
for, so not tracing it would be fine I think.
Also, Boris, why do we need to redo that rdmsr until we see that bit
set? Can't we simply do the rdmsr once and then be done with it?
