On 16-11-21 15:22:09, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2016-11-20 21:54, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> > Code cleanup for improving code readability and error path fixes
> > and cleanup removing use of devm_kfree.
> 
> Two things in one, not very nice. Especially the dma_free_coherent is
> really a bug and the other is a cleanup. Can you make a separate patch
> for the bug?
> 
> As for the cleanup, I don't like the one line conditions too, but I
> don't think it is worth a patch. At least the TX path should be solved
> with my suggestion in patch 2.

Agreed.

- Sanchayan.

> 
> --
> Stefan
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysancha...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
> > index 08882f7..2987a16 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c
> > @@ -226,8 +226,10 @@ static void dspi_rx_dma_callback(void *arg)
> >     if (!(dspi->dataflags & TRAN_STATE_RX_VOID)) {
> >             for (i = 0; i < dma->curr_xfer_len; i++) {
> >                     d = dspi->dma->rx_dma_buf[i];
> > -                   rx_word ? (*(u16 *)dspi->rx = d) :
> > -                                           (*(u8 *)dspi->rx = d);
> > +                   if (rx_word)
> > +                           *(u16 *)dspi->rx = d;
> > +                   else
> > +                           *(u8 *)dspi->rx = d;
> >                     dspi->rx += rx_word + 1;
> >             }
> >     }
> > @@ -247,14 +249,20 @@ static int dspi_next_xfer_dma_submit(struct
> > fsl_dspi *dspi)
> >     tx_word = is_double_byte_mode(dspi);
> >  
> >     for (i = 0; i < dma->curr_xfer_len - 1; i++) {
> > -           val = tx_word ? *(u16 *) dspi->tx : *(u8 *) dspi->tx;
> > +           if (tx_word)
> > +                   val = *(u16 *) dspi->tx;
> > +           else
> > +                   val = *(u8 *) dspi->tx;
> >             dspi->dma->tx_dma_buf[i] =
> >                     SPI_PUSHR_TXDATA(val) | SPI_PUSHR_PCS(dspi->cs) |
> >                     SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(0) | SPI_PUSHR_CONT;
> >             dspi->tx += tx_word + 1;
> >     }
> >  
> > -   val = tx_word ? *(u16 *) dspi->tx : *(u8 *) dspi->tx;
> > +   if (tx_word)
> > +           val = *(u16 *) dspi->tx;
> > +   else
> > +           val = *(u8 *) dspi->tx;
> >     dspi->dma->tx_dma_buf[i] = SPI_PUSHR_TXDATA(val) |
> >                                     SPI_PUSHR_PCS(dspi->cs) |
> >                                     SPI_PUSHR_CTAS(0);
> > @@ -430,9 +438,11 @@ static int dspi_request_dma(struct fsl_dspi
> > *dspi, phys_addr_t phy_addr)
> >     return 0;
> >  
> >  err_slave_config:
> > -   devm_kfree(dev, dma->rx_dma_buf);
> > +   dma_free_coherent(dev, DSPI_DMA_BUFSIZE,
> > +                   dma->rx_dma_buf, dma->rx_dma_phys);
> >  err_rx_dma_buf:
> > -   devm_kfree(dev, dma->tx_dma_buf);
> > +   dma_free_coherent(dev, DSPI_DMA_BUFSIZE,
> > +                   dma->tx_dma_buf, dma->tx_dma_phys);
> >  err_tx_dma_buf:
> >     dma_release_channel(dma->chan_tx);
> >  err_tx_channel:

Reply via email to