Eric, > On 15.11.2016, at 19:19, Eric Biggers <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:20:45PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> /** >> * f2crypt_decrypt_page() - Decrypts a page in-place >> - * @page: The page to decrypt. Must be locked. >> + * @inode: The encrypted inode to decrypt. >> + * @page: The page to decrypt. Must be locked. > > Strictly speaking, it's not the inode itself being decrypted, but rather the > data associated with it. Could this be better expressed as something like > "The inode to which the page belongs"?
Yes, you're right. Will address that! Thanks, David
