On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 02:53:00PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Here is part from /proc/interrupts that contains interrupt 18 *without*
> irqpoll:
>
> ---------------------------
> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
> 0: 47 0 0 0 IO-APIC 2-edge timer
> 1: 0 0 0 2 IO-APIC 1-edge i8042
> 7: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC 7-edge
> parport0
> 8: 0 0 0 1 IO-APIC 8-edge rtc0
> 9: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC 9-fasteoi acpi
> 10: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC 10-edge
> radeon
> 12: 0 0 0 4 IO-APIC 12-edge i8042
> 16: 0 96 4 990 IO-APIC 16-fasteoi
> ohci_hcd:usb3, ohci_hcd:usb4, snd_hda_intel:card0
> 17: 0 2457 1 140 IO-APIC 17-fasteoi
> ehci_hcd:usb1
> 18: 1 11 43 99947 IO-APIC 18-fasteoi
> ohci_hcd:usb5, ohci_hcd:usb6, ohci_hcd:usb7
Can you connect the printer to a different port so that it doesn't use
OCHI to see if it makes any difference?
> 19: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC 19-fasteoi
> ehci_hcd:usb2
> 22: 0 22169 139 8731 IO-APIC 22-fasteoi
> ahci[0000:00:11.0]
> 25: 0 0 11 753 PCI-MSI 1048576-edge
> eth0
> (...)
> ---------------------------
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
