On Tue, 29 Nov, at 12:42:43PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> IIRC, and my pounding head really doesn't remember much, the comment
> reads like we need the large fudge factor because hackbench. That is,
> hackbench would like this test to go away, but others benchmarks will
> tank.
> Now, if only I would've written down which benchmarks that were.. awell.
Going out on a limb: Chris' schbench?

Reply via email to