On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:44:19AM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov, at 12:42:43PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > IIRC, and my pounding head really doesn't remember much, the comment
> > reads like we need the large fudge factor because hackbench. That is,
> > hackbench would like this test to go away, but others benchmarks will
> > tank.
> > 
> > Now, if only I would've written down which benchmarks that were.. awell.
> Going out on a limb: Chris' schbench?

No, that actually wants that test taken out as well. It might have been
things like sysbench or so.

Reply via email to