On 2016-11-30 23:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 1:48:20 PM CET Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi! >> >> changes v2 -> v3 >> - document the new compatible strings prefixed with "axentia,". >> >> changes v1 -> v2 >> - squash the fixup into the correct patch, sorry for the noise. >> >> After finally having all essintial drivers upstreamed (the >> last ones are currently in -next) I would like to have the >> dts and the defconfig also upstreamed. >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> >> Peter Rosin (2): >> ARM: dts: add devicetree for the Axentia TSE-850 >> ARM: tse850_defconfig: add Axentia TSE-850 >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/axentia.txt | 19 ++ >> MAINTAINERS | 8 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/axentia-linea.dtsi | 53 +++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/axentia-tse850-3.dts | 276 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/configs/tse850_defconfig | 223 +++++++++++++++++ >> 6 files changed, 580 insertions(+) > > Hi Peter, > > I'm a bit confused. Are these just boards using the sama5d31 SoC, > or something else?
No no, it's just what it seems, a cpu module with a sama5d31 and a board using it (a couple more boards using the cpu module coming later). I just didn't know about the naming conventions. > Normally, dts files are picked up by the SoC platform maintainers > and named with a prefix for that soc. I was starting to wonder about the deafening silence, now I know the reason... > Also, we don't normally add a defconfig file for a specific > machine, just add the options you want to sama5_defconfig > and multi_v7_defconfig, and send all patches to the > at91 maitainers. I'll make some changes, thank you very much for the pointers! Cheers, Peter