On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:29:00PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> On 11/26/2016 09:17 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > > Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
> > > not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the
> > > firmware event log.
> > >
> > > This patch enables support for providing the TPM 2.0 event log in
> > > binary form. TPM 2.0 event log supports a crypto agile format that
> > > records multiple digests, which is different from TPM 1.2. This
> > > patch enables the tpm_bios_log_setup for TPM 2.0 and adds the
> > > event log parser which understand the TPM 2.0 crypto agile format.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <na...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > I would not rush with new patch set versions as long as the testing is
> > almost completely lacking. I didn't even have time to read the previous
> > version properly before this came out.
> Sure Jarkko. My apologies for multiple versions. I will wait for testing,
> before posting my next version.
You could send now a new version because probably anyone who wants
to review your patches has had a chance to look at it. My point was
that you wait for at least few days.
Maybe Jason could help testing your patches. I don't know when I have
time to setup environment. He had OF environment available.