On Monday 05 December 2016 03:39 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > The aemif clock is added twice to the lookup table in da850.c. This > breaks the children list of pll0_sysclk3 as we're using the same list > links in struct clk. When calling clk_set_rate(), we get stuck in > propagate_rate(). > > Create a separate clock for nand, inheriting the rate of the aemif > clock and retrieve it in the davinci_nand module. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > index e770c97..c008e5e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > @@ -367,6 +367,11 @@ static struct clk aemif_clk = { > .flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED, > }; > > +static struct clk aemif_nand_clk = { > + .name = "nand", > + .parent = &aemif_clk, > +}; > + > static struct clk usb11_clk = { > .name = "usb11", > .parent = &pll0_sysclk4, > @@ -537,7 +542,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = { > CLK("da830-mmc.0", NULL, &mmcsd0_clk), > CLK("da830-mmc.1", NULL, &mmcsd1_clk), > CLK("ti-aemif", NULL, &aemif_clk), > - CLK(NULL, "aemif", &aemif_clk), > + CLK(NULL, "aemif", &aemif_nand_clk),
Why use a NULL device name here? Same question was asked on v2 submission. Also, can you please make sure you are testing this in both DT mode (da850-lcdk) and non-DT boot (da850-evm). Thanks, Sekhar
