On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Sebastian Frias <s...@laposte.net> wrote:
> Introduce SETBITFIELD(msb, lsb, value) macro to ease dealing with
> continuous bitfields, just as BIT(x) does for single bits.
If it's a bitfield, why not calling it that way?
So what about BITFIELD(start ,size), like arch/tile/kernel/tile-desc_32.c has?
> SETBITFIELD_ULL(msb, lsb, value) macro is also added.
Confused by the need for a "value" parameter...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
