On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:37:56PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thursday 08 March 2007 18:44, Dave Jiang wrote: > > > In spite of kgdb, shouldn't it have that \n anyways in case some other code > > gets added in the future after the macro? Or are you saying that there > > should > > never be any code ever after that macro? > > Sure if there is mainline code added after that macro we add the \n. > But only if it makes sense to add code there, which it didn't in kgdb.
Was that because with recent enough tools and config options there was enough annotations so GDB could finally figure out where things had stopped? Thanks. -- Tom Rini - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
