On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:39:03PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> > > try_release_extent_state reduces the gfp mask to GFP_NOFS if it is > compatible. This is true for GFP_KERNEL as well. There is no real > reason to do that though. There is no new lock taken down the > the only consumer of the gfp mask which is > try_release_extent_state > clear_extent_bit > __clear_extent_bit > alloc_extent_state > > So this seems just unnecessary and confusing. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
