Am 16.01.2017 um 11:26 schrieb Neil Armstrong:
> On 01/15/2017 04:44 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:42 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
>>> it really makes a difference if we write
>>>
>>>     memory@0 {
>>>             device_type = "memory";
>>>             linux,usable-memory = <0x0 0x1000000 0x0 0x7f000000>;
>>>     };
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>>     memory@0 {
>>>             device_type = "memory";
>>>             reg = <0x0 0x1000000 0x0 0x7f000000>;
>>>     };
>>>
>>> The second version leads to failure of the Odroid C2.
>>>
>>> When I looked at /sys/firmware/fdt I saw this difference:
>>>
>>> --- fails
>>> +++ works
>>>
>>>         memory@0 {
>>> -               device_type = "memory";
>>>                 reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x78000000>;
>>> +               device_type = "memory";
>>> +               linux,usable-memory = <0x0 0x1000000 0x0 0x7f000000>;
>>>         };
>>>
>>> I found the following sentence in the NXP forum:
>>> In case you want to overwrite the memory usage passed from u-boot, you
>>> can use "linux,usable-memory".
>>> https://community.nxp.com/thread/382284
>>
>> The Odroid-C2 is in mainline U-Boot. Please submit a patch to U-Boot
>> instead of forcing the creation of unnecessary new .dts files onto
>> everyone due to hardcoded linux,usable-memory properties. In fact, it
>> already reserves 0x1000000, so it seems you are merely using an older
>> U-Boot.
>>
>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-meson/board.c;h=f159cbf849f75ab046e6f3a025bbc97c0bcfd59d;hb=HEAD#l39
>>
>> I would bet that the upper limit is unrelated here.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andreas
>>
> 
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> I really disagree about relying on any work or properties added by any 
> bootloader here, Amlogic SoCs has
> a lot of u-boot version in the field, and the Odroid-C2 is part of this.
> 
> Even if Odroid-c2 is in mainline U-Boot or not, the mainline Linux kernel 
> should work using
> any U-boot version even with the one provided by Amlogic on their openlinux 
> distribution channel.

That is not the position of the kernel maintainers though. They
deliberately rely on timers being enabled before entering Linux, which
broke my afboot-stm32 (which I could fix) as well as s5pv210 and vf610
based platforms by F+S (which remain broken to date).

And I documented how to chainload mainline U-Boot from downstream
Amlogic U-Boot, so it is easily fixable on Meson. The only thing missing
is Carlo resubmitting his MMC patches.

A bug somewhere does not justify breaking the whole Meson-gx* .dts
design for everyone, especially not without CC'ing me as the original
creator!

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Reply via email to