Hi, On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:29:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:00:36AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > I actually have a set of patches somewhere which transforms the remaining > direct users of arm_pm_restart to use the framework (unless I removed it > from my trees - I don't really recall). I just never got around to submit > it, and then [2] happened and I lost interest.
I found a patchset from you from 2016. I see a few Acks and no negative feedback. Looks like they only need to be uploaded at Russel's patch system? arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844441/ arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844481/ drivers/firmware/psci.c https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844411/ arch/arm/kernel/setup.c https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844451/ removal of ARM64 arm_pm_restart https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844471/ removal of ARM32 arm_pm_restart https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844391/ > > No such thing exists for poweroff. Guenter also wrote something for > > that [1], but Linus intervened [2]. Anyways, pm_power_off is at > > least architecture independent. > > > That was by far the most frustrating kernel development experience > I ever head :-(. Sorry for the reminder. -- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
