Hi, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:11:16PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 01:44:04PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:29:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:00:36AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > > I actually have a set of patches somewhere which transforms the remaining > > > direct users of arm_pm_restart to use the framework (unless I removed it > > > from my trees - I don't really recall). I just never got around to submit > > > it, and then [2] happened and I lost interest. > > > > I found a patchset from you from 2016. I see a few Acks and no > > negative feedback. Looks like they only need to be uploaded at > > Russel's patch system? > > > > arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844441/ > > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844481/ > > drivers/firmware/psci.c > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844411/ > > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844451/ > > removal of ARM64 arm_pm_restart > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844471/ > > removal of ARM32 arm_pm_restart > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844391/ > > Nice, those would be excellent preparatory work for my earlier > framework proposal. Do you want me to pick those up and run with > them a bit?
They implement what I suggested earlier in this thread, so I think they should get upstream. If you pick them up, you can add my Reviewed-By to all patches. After having them upstream, ARM, ARM64, MIPS and PPC use do_kernel_restart() for reboot. -- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
