Hi Amir, On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:47:43 +0200 Amir Goldstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's strange. > overlayfs-next whose head is the for mentioned commit is based on > v4.10-rc6 and has no duplicated patches AFAICS
The duplicate patches are between v4.10-rc1 and the vfs-miklos tree and the overlayfs tree includes v4.10-rc1, so there is interactions there. > Please note that my patch moves do_clone_file_range() from line 1743 > to line 2566, > because it needs to use file_start_write(), which is defined in line 2533. > so perhaps the conflict was not resolved correctly? That is probably what happened, but if the vfs-miklos tree is cleaned up, these conflicts will all go away. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
