On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36:20AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:30:45PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > I don't think you understand how it works. downgrade_write() turns a write
> > lock into read held. To make that last sequence valid, you'd need:
>
> Correct, and I'm surprised that didn't explode in different ways.
>
> >
> > down_write(&rw);
> > downgrade_write(&rw);
> > lockdep_assert_held_read(&rw)
> > up_read(&rw);
> >
> > or just not drop up_write() from the last section.
>
> Right, but also, there seems to be a missing lockdep annotation to make
> that work. That is, downgrade_write() doesn't have a lockdep annotation,
> so it (lockdep) will still think its a write lock.
>
>
> Let me try and fix both issues.
Something like so I suppose,... completely untested.
There could be a good reason for the current lockdep behaviour, but I
cannot remember.
---
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index 45ba475d4be3..dfa9e40f83d5 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -123,10 +123,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(up_write);
*/
void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- /*
- * lockdep: a downgraded write will live on as a write
- * dependency.
- */
+ rwsem_release(&sem->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
+ rwsem_acquire_read(&sem->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+
rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
__downgrade_write(sem);
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h
index a699f4048ba1..3bd584c81b0b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h
@@ -40,8 +40,10 @@ static inline void rwsem_set_reader_owned(struct
rw_semaphore *sem)
* do a write to the rwsem cacheline when it is really necessary
* to minimize cacheline contention.
*/
- if (sem->owner != RWSEM_READER_OWNED)
+ if (sem->owner != RWSEM_READER_OWNED) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(sem->owner != current);
WRITE_ONCE(sem->owner, RWSEM_READER_OWNED);
+ }
}
static inline bool rwsem_owner_is_writer(struct task_struct *owner)
