On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:15:15PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Maxime Ripard > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The pwm0_pins group name is suggesting that this is the only option usable > > for the PWM0 on the SoCs it's declared on. However, this is not the case > > and defining a second pwm0 group would be quite weird given the name of the > > first group. > > Can you elaborate on the second pwm0 option? I'm not seeing it in my > datasheets.
Hmmmm, I'm not sure why I did that anymore, looks like you're right... I'll drop this one, and queue the others for 4.12. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
