On 16/02/17 10:54, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com> writes:
>> On 15/02/17 13:44, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com> writes:
>>>> To avoid checkpatch warnings with new patches let's
>>>> start using the BIT() macro wherever possible.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rog...@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h      | 192 
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c |  48 +++++------
>>>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h    |  20 ++---
>>>>  3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>> index 14b7602..d514dca 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
>>>>  #define DWC3_DEVICE_EVENT_OVERFLOW                11
>>>>  
>>>>  #define DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_MASK      0xfffc
>>>> -#define DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_EHB       (1 << 31)
>>>> +#define DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_EHB       BIT(31)
>>>
>>> don't you need to include <linux/bitops.h> for this?
>>>
>>
>> I didn't get any build errors though.
> 
> indirect inclusion. Problems will show up only when headers are moved
> around ;-)
> 
Yes. better to include it. I'll send a v2 for this.

-- 
cheers,
-roger

Reply via email to