On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > AND WHY THE HELL WAS THIS UTTER SHITE SENT TO ME IF IT WAS COMMITTED > YESTERDAY?
.. and a slightly less annoying piece of crap in this pull request: that "PRIME_NUMBERS" config thing is utter garbage too. Why would you ask a user about it? The only valid use is for a kernel module that needs it to "select" it, so there's no point in asking the user if they want it. We don't want to make the kernel config phase any worse than it already is (and it's bad). Asking people idiotic and pointless questions is simply not ok. Christ. I dislike this pull request intensely, and I haven't even gotten to the point where I can even _test_ it yet. I'm very close to just saying "this is complete bullshit" and not pull any DRM crap this merge window. Honestly, if I find anything else, that's what I'll do. I might do it even without finding anything elze. And _reghardless_ of what happens this merge window, I will instate a hard rule that the DRM code needs to be in linux-next *before* the merge window opens. No last-minute crap. No shit that hasn't even been build-tested. Because I am _never_ going to accept this kind of crap in the future. If I find broken stuff like this from just a cursory examination and build test, things are seriously wrong. I think I'm also going to require the DRM pull requests to be split up, because as it is now, I'm in the situation that I have to accept all or nothing. Which is not good, when the "all" stuff is of this dubious quality. And if the DRM "maintenance" is about sending me random half-arsed crap in one big pull, I'm just not willing to deal with it. This is like the crazy ARM tree used to be. Guys, this needs to be fixed. Linus