According to the PCI local bus specifications (Revision 3.0, 3.2.5),
I/O Address space transactions are non-posted. On architectures where
I/O space is implemented through a chunk of memory mapped space mapped
to PCI address space (ie IA64/ARM/ARM64) the memory mapping for the
region backing I/O Address Space transactions determines the I/O
transactions attributes (before the transactions actually reaches the
PCI bus where it is handled according to the PCI specifications).

Current pci_remap_iospace() interface, that is used to map the PCI I/O
Address Space into virtual address space, use pgprot_device() as memory
attribute for the virtual address mapping, that in some architectures
(ie ARM64) provides non-cacheable but write bufferable mappings (ie
posted writes), which clash with the non-posted write behaviour for I/O
Address Space mandated by the PCI specifications.

Update the prot ioremap_page_range() parameter in pci_remap_iospace()
to pgprot_noncached to ensure that the virtual mapping backing
I/O Address Space guarantee non-posted write transactions issued
when addressing I/O Address Space through the MMIO mapping.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
Cc: Russell King <li...@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index bd98674..bfb3c6e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -3375,7 +3375,7 @@ int pci_remap_iospace(const struct resource *res, 
phys_addr_t phys_addr)
                return -EINVAL;
 
        return ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + resource_size(res), phys_addr,
-                                 pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL));
+                                 pgprot_noncached(PAGE_KERNEL));
 #else
        /* this architecture does not have memory mapped I/O space,
           so this function should never be called */
-- 
2.10.0

Reply via email to