"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > On 2017/03/08 11:29AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> > I wasn't sure if you were planning on picking up KPROBES_ON_FTRACE for >> > v4.11. If so, it would be good to take this patch through the powerpc >> > tree. Otherwise, this can go via Ingo's tree. >> >> If you guys convince Ingo that this should go _now_, then just cherry >> pick what was merged into tip/perf/core that is needed for the arch >> specific stuff and go from there. > > Ok, in hindsight, I think Michael's concern was actually for v4.12
Yes I was talking about 4.12, sorry I thought that was implied :) > itself, in which case this particular patch can go via powerpc tree, > while the rest of the patches in this series can go via your tree. > > Michael? Yeah I think that's the easiest option. The function will be temporarily unused until the two trees are merged, but I think that's fine. cheers