Em Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:39:36PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:44:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:29:07AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> >> Em Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:15:22PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann escreveu:
> >> >> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:22 AM, gregkh <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> 
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > All now queued up in the stable trees, thanks.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Like 4.9.y it builds clean except for a couple of stack frame size 
> >> >> > warnings
> >> >> > and this one that continues to puzzle me.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > /bin/sh: 1: 
> >> >> > /home/buildslave/workspace/kernel-builder/arch/x86/defconfig/allmodconfig+CONFIG_OF=n/label/builder/next/build-x86/tools/objtool//fixdep:
> >> >> > Permission denied
> >> >>
> >> >> Jiri? Josh?
> >> >
> >> > hum, looks like it imight be related to this fix we did for perf:
> >> >   abb26210a395 perf tools: Force fixdep compilation at the start of the 
> >> > build
> >> >
> >> > it's forcing fixdep to be build as first.. having it as a simple 
> >> > dependency
> >> > (which AFAICS is objtool case), the make -jX occasionaly raced on high 
> >> > cpu
> >> > servers, and executed unfinished binary, hence the permission fail
> >>
> >> It's probably another variation of this bug, but the commit you cite got 
> >> merged
> >> into 4.10-rc1, while the problem still persists in mainline (4.11-rc2+).
> >
> > the problem is in objtool build right? the fix was for perf build
> 
> Ah, got it. Yes, that must be it then. I supposed we coul duplicate what you
> did for perf in objtool, but a cleaner way would be to generalize it for all 
> of
> tools/, right?

Humm, can't we have just one fixdep?

- Arnaldo

Reply via email to