On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:58:05AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:04:50PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:56:31PM -0700, Andrew Duggan wrote:
> > > When the firmware identifies a contact as a palm the driver sets the tool
> > > type to MT_TOOL_PALM, but sets the slot state as active. Reporting the
> > > palm as active results in userspace input libraries considering the palm
> > > as a valid contact. Touchpads which previously were using hid-multitouch
> > > are now not suppressing palms when switching to the RMI4 driver. This
> > > change fixes palm rejection when using the RMI4 driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Duggan <adug...@synaptics.com>
> > > Tested-by: Cameron Gutman <aicomman...@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_2d_sensor.c | 3 ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_2d_sensor.c 
> > > b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_2d_sensor.c
> > > index 8bb866c..8d1f295 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_2d_sensor.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_2d_sensor.c
> > > @@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ void rmi_2d_sensor_abs_report(struct rmi_2d_sensor 
> > > *sensor,
> > >           input_mt_slot(input, slot);
> > >  
> > >   input_mt_report_slot_state(input, obj->mt_tool,
> > > -                            obj->type != RMI_2D_OBJECT_NONE);
> > > +                            (obj->type != RMI_2D_OBJECT_NONE)
> > > +                            && (obj->type != RMI_2D_OBJECT_PALM));
> > >  
> > >   if (obj->type != RMI_2D_OBJECT_NONE) {
> > >           obj->x = sensor->tracking_pos[slot].x;
> > 
> > If we are relying on hardware to do palm rejection, then we should not
> > be reporting the rest of the events for palm either (i.e. the condition
> > in the if statement above should also be updated).
> > 
> > But I do not understand why userspace doe snot do the right thing? Yes,
> > the slot is active, but reported contact type is MT_TOOL_PALM, so it
> > knows what it deals with.
> 
> oops, filed: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100243
> until RMI4 we had no drivers setting that tool type and we still don't have
> rull RMI4 in the released kernels, so it was a simple oversight.

Actually drivers/hid/hid-asus.c is using MT_TOOL_PALM since 4.10-rc1.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Reply via email to