On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:37 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]> > > >From what I can tell there is only a couple spots where we are actually > checking the return value of sk_busy_loop. As there are only a few > consumers of that data, and the data being checked for can be replaced > with a check for !skb_queue_empty() we might as well just pull the code > out of sk_busy_loop and place it in the spots that actually need it. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]> > ---
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
