On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:34:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 04:06:26PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> > For some platforms, for example Broadwell, it doesn't support cycles
> > for LBR. But the perf always prints cycles:0, it's not necessary.
> > 
> > The patch refactors the LBR info print code and drops the cycles:0.
> > 
> > For example: perf report --branch-history --no-children --stdio
> 
> Can I get some reviewed-by or acked-by for this patch? Andi? Kan?

Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

-Andi

Reply via email to