The current use of "RCU_TRACE(statement);" can cause odd bugs, especially where "statement" is a local-variable declaration, as it can leave a misplaced ";" in the source code. This commit therefore converts these to "RCU_TRACE(statement;)", which avoids the misplaced ";".
Reported-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index df8f6401f2d5..e8843bf0f5e1 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -2793,14 +2793,14 @@ static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags) */ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) { - RCU_TRACE(unsigned long mask); - RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda)); - RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode); + RCU_TRACE(unsigned long mask;) + RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);) + RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;) if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)) return; - RCU_TRACE(mask = rdp->grpmask); + RCU_TRACE(mask = rdp->grpmask;) trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum + 1 - !!(rnp->qsmask & mask), TPS("cpuofl")); -- 2.5.2
