On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:59:15PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On 13 April 2017 at 15:32, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:28:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > >> I still wonder about the whole !running vs !weight thing., > > > > Ah, since we use this for both util _and_ load, we need !running && > > !weight, and it so happens that !weight implies !running. Is that it? > > exactly > sorry, I should have started with that
Damn, that just bring me around to wondering why running is the right condition to create lost-time. Because for runnable we want everything that has weight.
