On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Luis Oliveira
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08-May-17 17:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 11:37 +0100, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>>> + enabled, slave_activity, raw_stat, stat);
>>> +
>>
>>> + if (slave_activity) {
>>> + if (stat & DW_IC_INTR_RD_REQ) {
>>
>> Looking into next condition (stat & DW_IC_INTR_RX_DONE) I would
>> exchange these lines
>>
>
> By order? I don't think I understood your point. Please elaborate a little
> more.
if (stat & DW_IC_INTR_RD_REQ) {
if (slave_activity) {
And perhaps refactor function a bit.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
