* Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) <alexander.le...@verizon.com> wrote:
> Right, and as you can see from this patchset where we added to
> tools/include/ when needed and removed from lib/lockdep/uinclude,
> liblockdep is slowly creeping the "right" way.
>
> perf, like liblockdep, didn't finish the switch to exclusively use
> tools/include/ yet.
>
> I can put more work into getting it done over the next few releases,
> but it's not something I see as a critical fix for the upcoming
> release.
Since liblockdep was broken for an extended period of time I'd really
like to see this fixed before I apply any more patches.
Thanks,
Ingo
