On 05/24/2017 10:20 AM, Jérôme Glisse wrote:
[...8<...]
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE)
+int device_private_entry_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+                      unsigned long addr,
+                      swp_entry_t entry,
+                      unsigned int flags,
+                      pmd_t *pmdp)
+{
+       struct page *page = device_private_entry_to_page(entry);
+
+       /*
+        * The page_fault() callback must migrate page back to system memory
+        * so that CPU can access it. This might fail for various reasons
+        * (device issue, device was unsafely unplugged, ...). When such
+        * error conditions happen, the callback must return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS.
+        *
+        * Note that because memory cgroup charges are accounted to the device
+        * memory, this should never fail because of memory restrictions (but
+        * allocation of regular system page might still fail because we are
+        * out of memory).
+        *
+        * There is a more in-depth description of what that callback can and
+        * cannot do, in include/linux/memremap.h
+        */
+       return page->pgmap->page_fault(vma, addr, page, flags, pmdp);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(device_private_entry_fault);
+#endif /* CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE */
+
  static void pgmap_radix_release(struct resource *res)
  {
        resource_size_t key, align_start, align_size, align_end;
@@ -321,6 +351,10 @@ void *devm_memremap_pages(struct device *dev, struct 
resource *res,
        }
        pgmap->ref = ref;
        pgmap->res = &page_map->res;
+       pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC;
+       pgmap->page_fault = NULL;
+       pgmap->page_free = NULL;
+       pgmap->data = NULL;
mutex_lock(&pgmap_lock);
        error = 0;
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index d744cff..f5357ff 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -736,6 +736,19 @@ config ZONE_DEVICE
If FS_DAX is enabled, then say Y. +config DEVICE_PRIVATE
+       bool "Unaddressable device memory (GPU memory, ...)"
+       depends on X86_64
+       depends on ZONE_DEVICE
+       depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG
+       depends on MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
+       depends on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
+
+       help
+         Allows creation of struct pages to represent unaddressable device
+         memory; i.e., memory that is only accessible from the device (or
+         group of devices).
+

Hi Jerome,

CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE has caused me some problems, because it's not coupled to 
HMM_DEVMEM.

To fix this, my first choice would be to just s/DEVICE_PRIVATE/HMM_DEVMEM/g , because I don't see any value to DEVICE_PRIVATE as an independent Kconfig choice. It's complicating the Kconfig choices, and adding problems. However, if DEVICE_PRIVATE must be kept, then something like this also fixes my HMM tests:

From: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:13:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] hmm: select CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE with HMM_DEVMEM

The HMM_DEVMEM feature is useless without the various
features that are guarded with CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE.
Therefore, auto-select DEVICE_PRIVATE when selecting
HMM_DEVMEM.

Otherwise, you can easily end up with a partially
working HMM installation: if you select HMM_DEVMEM,
but do not select DEVICE_PRIVATE, then faulting and
migrating to a device (such as a GPU) works, but CPU
page faults are ignored, so the page never migrates
back to the CPU.

Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
---
 mm/Kconfig | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index 46296d5d7570..23d2f5ec865e 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -318,6 +318,8 @@ config HMM_DEVMEM
        bool "HMM device memory helpers (to leverage ZONE_DEVICE)"
        depends on ARCH_HAS_HMM
        select HMM
+       select DEVICE_PRIVATE
+
        help
          HMM devmem is a set of helper routines to leverage the ZONE_DEVICE
          feature. This is just to avoid having device drivers to replicating a 
lot
--
2.13.1

This is a minor thing, and I don't think this needs to hold up merging HMM v23 into -mm, IMHO. But I would like it fixed at some point.

thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

Reply via email to