On Thursday 08 June 2017 08:16:18 Darren Hart wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:49:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Pali Rohár <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Saturday 27 May 2017 15:33:14 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Pali Rohár <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > > > >> Okay, got it. But on your opinion does it make sense to do > > >> > > >> pr_info("\tobject_id: %2pE\n", g->object_id); > > >> > > >> instead? > > >> > > >> For ASCII it will go as is previously, otherwise escaping would be > > >> done. > > > > > > Both is OK for me. Do you want to send a new patch with %2pE? > > > > To me it looks slightly cleaner. > > I don't want to let this one fall through the cracks. Pali, is a new one > coming?
So.. which modifier to use? Andy already proposed two alternatives and basically I'm fine all 3 which are in this thread. -- Pali Rohár [email protected]
