On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:04:18PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > So, this reveals two thins: > > 1) shall we define NVME_NIDT_UUID_LEN to be UUID_LEN or substitute it > > completely with the latter? > > No, we have NVME_NIDT_UUID_LEN but also NVME_NIDT_NGUID_LEN and > NVME_NIDT_EUI64_LEN.
Yeah, and I'd rather keep the defines for fields defined in the spec in nvme.h > I'm not sure the NVMe NGUID is the same as a GUID (a.k.a little endian > UUID). Quoting from the spec: It's not at all, the field just has a very unfortunate name in the spec.
