On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Kani, Toshimitsu <toshi.k...@hpe.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hpe.com> wrote: >> > Sysfs "badblocks" information may be updated during run-time that: >> > - MCE, SCI, and sysfs "scrub" may add new bad blocks >> > - Writes and ioctl() may clear bad blocks >> > >> > Add support to send sysfs notifications to sysfs "badblocks" file >> > under region and pmem directories when their badblocks information >> > is re-evaluated (but is not necessarily changed) during run-time. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hpe.com> >> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> >> > Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.ve...@intel.com> >> > Cc: Linda Knippers <linda.knipp...@hpe.com> >> > --- >> > v2: Send notifications for the clearing case >> > --- >> >> This looks good to me, I've applied it, but I also want to extend the >> ndctl unit tests to cover this mechanism. > > Right. For the time being, would you mind to use the attached test > program for your sanity tests? It simply monitors sysfs notifications > and prints badblocks info... Sorry for inconvenience. > > Since I am not familiar with the ndctl unit tests and I am traveling for > the rest of the month, I may have to look into it after I am back. >
No worries, I'll take a look at integrating this. Have a nice trip!
