On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 07, 2017 07:39:16 PM Len Brown wrote: >> From: Len Brown <len.br...@intel.com> >> >> The cpufreqa/scaling_cur_freq sysfs attribute is now provided by >> the x86 cpufreq core on all modern x86 systems, including >> all systems supported by the intel_pstate driver. > > Not sure what you mean by "x86 cpufreq core"?
I refer to code that builds if (CONFIG_X86 && CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) Since it was enough to provoke a comment form you, how about this wording?: The cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq sysfs attribute is now provided by shared x86 cpufreq code on modern x86 systems, including all systems supported by the intel_pstate driver. > Besides, I'd reorder this change with respect to patch [4/5] as this > eliminates the hook entirely and then the "performance"-related change > would only affect non-HWP. I don't actually see a problem with either order, but i'll send the refresh with the order you suggest. thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center