On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 07:07:11PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> @@ -1220,6 +1238,9 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, pmd_t 
> orig_pmd)
>       if (unlikely(!pmd_same(*vmf->pmd, orig_pmd)))
>               goto out_unlock;
>  
> +     if (unlikely(!pmd_present(orig_pmd)))
> +             goto out_unlock;
> +

Hm. Shouldn't we wait for the page here?

>       page = pmd_page(orig_pmd);
>       VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageCompound(page) || !PageHead(page), page);
>       /*
> @@ -1556,6 +1577,12 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, 
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>       if (is_huge_zero_pmd(orig_pmd))
>               goto out;
>  
> +     if (unlikely(!pmd_present(orig_pmd))) {
> +             VM_BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIGRATION) &&
> +                               !is_pmd_migration_entry(orig_pmd));
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
>       page = pmd_page(orig_pmd);
>       /*
>        * If other processes are mapping this page, we couldn't discard
> @@ -1770,6 +1797,23 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t 
> *pmd,
>       preserve_write = prot_numa && pmd_write(*pmd);
>       ret = 1;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION
> +     if (is_swap_pmd(*pmd)) {
> +             swp_entry_t entry = pmd_to_swp_entry(*pmd);
> +
> +             VM_BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIGRATION) &&
> +                               !is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd));
> +             if (is_write_migration_entry(entry)) {
> +                     pmd_t newpmd;
> +
> +                     make_migration_entry_read(&entry);
> +                     newpmd = swp_entry_to_pmd(entry);
> +                     set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmd, newpmd);

I was confused by this. Could you copy comment from change_pte_range()
here?

> +             }
> +             goto unlock;
> +     }
> +#endif
> +
>       /*
>        * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only
>        * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply via email to