On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 09:49:40AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>
> The pointer intel_ucode_patch does not need to be in global scope,
> so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> "symbol 'intel_ucode_patch' was not declared. Should it be static?"
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> index d525a0bd7d28..59edbe9d4ccb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
>
> /* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */
> -struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch;
> +static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch;
>
> static inline bool cpu_signatures_match(unsigned int s1, unsigned int p1,
> unsigned int s2, unsigned int p2)
> --
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
