Hi Geert, > > +static inline int i2c_check_msg_for_dma(struct i2c_msg *msg, unsigned int > > threshold, > > + u8 **ptr_for_bounce_buf) > > __must_check?
Yes, why not. > Isn't this function a bit large to be inlined? That can be argued, yes. But I am unsure to bloat the core if the function is so rarely needed... > > +static inline void i2c_release_bounce_buf(struct i2c_msg *msg, u8 > > *bounce_buf) > > This one is smaller. Yup, but of course, they should be put in the same place, whereever that may be. Thanks, Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
