On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:25:25PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 02:57:38PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Personally I don't care that much, but the risk of conflicts is much > > higher on the block side, than on the kernfs side. So might be the > > path of less resistance to pull it through the block tree. And I'd be > > happy to do that, if the sign offs on the kernfs side are sufficient. > > Block tree it is then. Let's wait for Greg to respond.
block tree is fine with me, I'll go ack the kernfs patches now. thanks, greg k-h
