On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:26:14PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 13:17 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Which brings us to the semantic question of would it be nice to have > > stacked IMA/EVM on the same file. > > > > I really don't think we do. I think allowing multiple keys for > > different part of trusting files is easy enough that we should have no > > need to fight over which keys do which. > > We definitely want to support different policies on the native and in > the namespace with different keys and keyrings.
Ok, so Stefan's code to support userspace in a container reading security.ima and getting back the value for security.ima@uid=1000 (if 1000 is the kuid of the container's root user) is in fact useful to IMA?
