On 08/08/17 12:38, Leonard Crestez wrote:
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 12:00 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
On 08/08/17 08:21, Zhang Rui wrote:
On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 16:08 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:11:08PM +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote:

On newer imx SOCs accessing OCOTP directly is wrong because the
ocotp clock
needs to be enabled first. Add support for reading those same
values through
the nvmem API instead.

The older path is preserved for compatibility with older dts and
because it
works correctly on imx6qdl chips.

Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.cres...@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn...@kernel.org>

I'm okay with the thermal change.
We still need ACK for the nvmem changes in this patch series.

NVMEM changes are already sent to Greg K H with other patches
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/26/164), should appear in next.

These patches have a compile-time dependency on each other. Wouldn't it
make more sense for the whole series to go through a single maintainer
tree, atomically? Most of the changes are in driver/thermal.

I was expecting that the nvmem change go in as fix in a rc release so that you could apply the other patches after that.

Let me ping Greg about this!!

I'm really very confused about how series that touch multiple areas are
applied. It seems to be a mostly ad-hoc process.


Reply via email to