On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:17:34AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Ah! this is quite confusing and not obvious that the trace is not for
> 1 signal but in fact 2 signals are interleaved and only 1 is displayed
> and that we have to filter them
> So ok i can see that the trace with cfs_rq=1 is not updated. At the
> opposite, we can see that the other trace (for the se i assume) is
> updated normally whereas they are normally synced on the same clock
So I'm still sitting on those patches that sync up the PELT window
between group-cfs_rq and its corresponding group-se.
I was hoping to get around to looking at all that again and adding
Josef's last few patches and promoting the lot from /experimental to
/core before going on holidays next week, but we'll see.