On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:54:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:43:52PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Looks like I need to rebase my patch on top of a9668cd6ee28, and
> than put an smp_mb__after_spinlock() between the lock and the unlock.
> Peter, any objections to that approach?  Other suggestions?

Hurm.. I'll have to try and understand that comment there again it

Reply via email to