On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:54:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:43:52PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Looks like I need to rebase my patch on top of a9668cd6ee28, and > than put an smp_mb__after_spinlock() between the lock and the unlock. > > Peter, any objections to that approach? Other suggestions?
Hurm.. I'll have to try and understand that comment there again it seems.