在 2017/8/11 22:44, Sean Paul 写道:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:15:16AM +0800, Sandy Huang wrote:
在 2017/8/11 2:05, Sean Paul 写道:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 05:35:52PM +0800, Sandy Huang wrote:
Hi Sean Paul,
Thanks for your review.
在 2017/8/10 3:58, Sean Paul 写道:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:00:59PM +0800, Sandy Huang wrote:
This adds support for Rockchip soc lvds found on rk3288
Based on the patches from Mark yao and Heiko Stuebner
Signed-off-by: Sandy Huang <h...@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark yao <mark....@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c | 734
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.h | 112 +++++
4 files changed, 856 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.h
<snip />
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a4ad3f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_lvds.c
<snip />
+ lvds->drm_dev = drm_dev;
+ port = of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 1);
+ if (!port) {
+ dev_err(dev, "can't found port point, please init lvds panel
port!\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ for_each_child_of_node(port, endpoint) {
+ remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint);
+ if (!remote) {
+ dev_err(dev, "can't found panel node, please init!\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_put_port;
+ }
+ if (!of_device_is_available(remote)) {
+ of_node_put(remote);
+ remote = NULL;
+ continue;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!remote) {
+ dev_err(dev, "can't found remote node, please init!\n");
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_put_port;
+ }
+
+ lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(remote);
+ if (!lvds->panel)
+ lvds->bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote);
drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge()
because the lvds ports maybe connect to lvds-panel or connect to
rk1000(which is convert RGB to CVBS output), so i have to get the remote
port parent and check the status, and final get the active remote point.
lvds_panel: lvds-panel {
status = "disabled";
ports {
panel_in_lvds: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&lvds_out_panel>;
};
};
};
rk1000: rk1000@0xff000000 {
status = "okay";
ports {
rk1000_in_lvds: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&lvds_out_panel>;
};
};
};
&lvds {
status = "okay";
ports {
lvds_out: port@1 {
reg = <1>;
lvds_out_panel: endpoint@0 {
reg = <0>;
remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_lvds>;
};
lvds_out_rk1000: endpoint@1 {
reg = <1>;
remote-endpoint = <&rk1000_in_lvds>;
};
};
};
};
Hi Sandy,
Forgive me, this is probably a stupid question. I don't see how this usecase is
unique from the other users of drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge. Couldn't you change
your devicetree bindings to conform to something drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge()
can work with?
Thank you,
Hi sean,
Maybe i can use the following method to use
drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() and no need to change my DT, but there is
another question:
The LVDS output format(rockchip,output、rockchip,data-mapping etc.)
depend on different panel, so it should be put under remote panel point.
If use drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge（), this just return panel or bridge, so
i have to back to get remote panel point and get the output format.
This should be easy since you can grab dev->of_node from panel or bridge once
it's found.
ok, thanks.
ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 1, 0, &lvds->panel,
&lvds->bridge);
if (ret)
ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 1, 1, &lvds->panel,
&lvds->bridge);
Would be easier to read in a for loop.
Sean
ok, thanks.
if (ret) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to find panel and bridge node\n");
ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
goto err_put_remote;
}
