3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

commit 3fa53ec2ed885b0aec3f0472e3b4a8a6f1cd748c upstream.

The irq chip callbacks irq_request/release_resources() have absolutely no
business with masking and unmasking the irq.

The core code unmasks the interrupt after complete setup and masks it
before invoking irq_release_resources().

The unmask is actually harmful as it happens before the interrupt is
completely initialized in __setup_irq().

Remove it.

Fixes: f6a8249f9e55 ("pinctrl: exynos: Lock GPIOs as interrupts when used as 
EINTs")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k...@kernel.org>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawro...@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kg...@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-g...@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.f...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c |    4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
@@ -200,8 +200,6 @@ static int exynos_irq_request_resources(
 
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
 
-       exynos_irq_unmask(irqd);
-
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -222,8 +220,6 @@ static void exynos_irq_release_resources
        shift = irqd->hwirq * bank_type->fld_width[PINCFG_TYPE_FUNC];
        mask = (1 << bank_type->fld_width[PINCFG_TYPE_FUNC]) - 1;
 
-       exynos_irq_mask(irqd);
-
        spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
 
        con = readl(d->virt_base + reg_con);


Reply via email to